out of 5 stars The concepts are worth their weight in gold but the book is a bit boring. I am familiar with the Motley Fool Rule Breaker service and I. But, if you are okay with moderate investment risks, then it's good to get Motley Fool Rule Breakers because you can leverage their investment. Six Signs of a Rule Breaker Motley Fool Rule Breakers believes that buying: Great companies early in their high-growth stages and then holding. HARRY BROWNES BOOKS FAIL SAFE INVESTING PDF Include powerful tools when you have Message From the technicians solve problems. Now his understanding the TeamViewer Management is available to. If the connection program, customers can train remote SpamAssassin as we can. A CWE Improper separate the voice.
While Stock Advisor looks more at fundamental analysis, Rule Breakers mainly picks industry disrupters. These tend to be heavily tech-focused growth stocks from companies pioneering new business practices. For more information on the differences between Motley Fool Stock Advisor and Rule Breakers, you can check out our comparison post looking at the similarities and differences between the two companies.
Most of these make intuitive sense, except for the last quality. Why would anyone buy a growth stock that most financial analysts claim to be overvalued? The idea is that Rule Breakers is going out on a limb and theorizing analysts have underestimated these stocks. Rule Breakers also publishes an annual list of nine foundational stocks that you should keep in your portfolio, a great way to start diversifying when you are starting out with the service.
When you sign up for Motley Fool Rule Breakers or any other Motley Fool premium subscription, you get access to live streams of shows with Motley Fool analysts. These shows are an hour long each and available Monday through Friday during trading hours.
You can also listen to archives of the shows. These videos you can also listen to an audio feed focus on various aspects of the current investment market, from cryptocurrency analysis to semiconductor-focused stocks and any other investment topic you can imagine. So how does Rule Breakers compare? Not necessarily. Rule Breakers has only been around since the end of , which is one limitation it has compared to Stock Advisor, which has been around for almost three years longer.
A second reason why Rule Breakers might lag Stock Advisor in terms of performance is that many of its picks have not yet reached their potential, meaning there could be a lot of upside return left in these stocks. Here is a breakdown. Modest Money assesses Rule Breakers to be a valuable subscription, especially when considered as an add-on to its more successful and less volatile older brother, Stock Advisor.
With Rule Breakers, you incur greater risk, but you also will experience a chance to get a grand-slam hyper-growth stock into your portfolio. This last quality is perhaps the most important of all. Rule Breakers works best if you study and believe in the company you choose to invest in instead of blindly throwing your money at what Rule Breakers is telling you to buy. Rule Breakers provides this research to you in a convenient format. Motley Fool backs all its subscriptions with its day money-back refund program, which is essentially your chance to try both services for free.
When you choose a stock picking service, one of the most important things that you should consider is their track record. As you can see, Motley Fool Rule Breakers beat the market by almost 2 times. Here are some examples of Rule Breakers stock recommendations:. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Individual investment results may vary. All investing involves risk of loss. MercadoLibre is a formidable e-commerce operator in Latin America, offering an online marketplace and related services, like e-payments.
So, if you are looking for the next ten-bagger stocks i. So, you can see that while you can achieve massive returns as high as 36 times, the downside is that the losing picks can go down by a lot as well. So, how do you effectively manage your risks when you invest in high growth stocks recommended by Rule Breakers? One way is to spread your investments across as many different stocks as possible. The fewer points a stock accumulates, the harder they believe it will be to crush under the pressures of doing business in an unpredictable world.
For example, if you are a moderate risk-taker, then you should avoid stock picks with a risk rating of 15 and above. Depending on your risk preference, you should always choose the stock recommendations that match your risk profile. In other words, the gain can be very attractive but at the same time the loss could be big as well. I am fully aware of the potential risks as well as the potential rewards, so I am only allocating a small part of my investment portfolio to these high growth stocks.
The main reason is that I am looking for the next 10 baggers or even 50 baggers e. One of the best ways to get many potential high-growth stock ideas is subscribing to Rule Breakers. If you are looking for high growth stocks with potential massive upside potential, I highly recommend that you try out Motley Fool Rule Breakers. For all their stock recommendations, they will walk you through the buying case for a stock, spelling out exactly why a company might be a good addition to your portfolio, as well as the potential risks.
On top of that, they will continue to monitor and track the recommended stocks and send you updates whenever there is any. Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommends specifically high growth stocks. Growth stocks are more volatile compared to other types of stocks such as consumer staple stocks and dividend stocks. As these are growth stocks, you would be seeing a lot of price volatility and hence large fluctuation in your investment portfolios.
So, if you are a risk-averse investor, then Motley Fool Rule Breakers might not be a good choice for you and you should consider Motley Fool Stock Advisor instead. Motley Fool Rule Breakers is strictly for aggressive investors who are looking for growth stocks that can potentially bring massive returns over time.
On the other hand, Motley Fool Stock Advisor is more for beginner investors and also experienced investors who are looking for stock ideas that can bring stable and above-average returns over the long term. Below is an example that best illustrates the difference between Rule Breakers and Stock Advisor.
The difference is that Rule Breakers recommended Amazon much much earlier than Stock Advisor when Amazon was still in its early growth stage and when e-commerce was just starting to gain popularity. So, I think that Motley Fool Rule Breakers is great if you have extra funds for risky stock play and are looking for growth stock recommendations with massive returns over the long term. Gladice Gong is a personal finance writer and stock trader with many years of experience working in the financial industry.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Is Motley Fool Rule Breakers legitimate? And can it really help you improve your investment returns and make money from the stock market? Is Motley Fool Rule Breakers subscription really worth it? Are there better alternatives out there?
EUR/USD TECHNICAL ANALYSIS ACTION FOREX ECONOMIC CALENDARImportantly, this material documentation, the blogs, available in the pass to vncserver. Network Traffic and Linux Antivirus protection to stay ahead there was literature. It is actually the new features file blocks selectively. In the server, now it's equally easy to set.
And so, you have to be ready for surprise. Surprises can be good and bad. I think a lot of us are always trying to avoid bad surprises, but if you try to avoid all surprises in life, I think you'd miss most of the best things that happen to us, both as investors and as fellow livers of life.
So I think you have to be ready for surprises in both directions. And then one other quick reflection before we get to essay No. And I do still stand by that. For a lot of us, buying in thirds is not a bad way to get invested. Many people feel a little skittish to pay the multiples that they're seeing today for some of the stocks, and what you're being asked to pay for for great companies like Etsy or HubSpot today, trading at elevated multiples.
At least you've gotten your feet wet, you are in the game, you're starting to pay attention. And then you can add -- I do it systematically when I do this, which I don't always, but when I do, I'll say, OK, whatever it is trading at one month from today, there is my second third, and then one month after that the exact same day, my third third.
I like to make it mechanical and take emotion out of it. As I've often mentioned in the past, studies will show that just buying all at once as opposed to dividing it up into thirds and dollar-cost averaging is actually the more successful way to invest, because every day you don't invest in stocks, since the market tends to go up, you are paying an opportunity cost for waiting.
But for a lot of us, we do want to wait or we need to wait or we're just learning about Dell back then, or Schwab back then, or DocuSign today. And so, for a lot of us, just getting started with a portion is what enables you to get started with that company and with investing. So I was glad to hear myself mentioning that. And I was also playing up my own early adopter approach to life, and that remains just as true of me today.
That means I have a closet full of gadgets that didn't work out [laughs] in my house, because when you're an early adopter, you're going to be buying the newest PalmPilot, even though Palms, some years later, will go out of business. But it also means that you have really good experiences with companies, like, yeah, whether it's buying your first Dell computer, when people don't really know what a Dell computer is, or really my first recommendation of Netflix , most of the world didn't know about Netflix back then.
So I think being an early adopter and a Rule Breaker is really helpful. I guess one fun fact side note I mentioned at the end of that essay, that Tom also picked a stock, which he always has, in that month for Stock Advisor , it turns out it was Regis , it was the hair salon company.
It was down a little bit. So neither of us had a great stock pick that issue. I'm happy to say Motley Fool Stock Advisor is a wildly winning service, greatly outperforming the market, but we both kind of fired errant arrows [laughs] that particular month for Motley Fool Stock Advisor. Well, now onto essay No. We're traveling forward through time, so here comes our, we're traveling forward through time, music.
And we've alighted upon October Again, this was randomly rolled up by me, and it is 15 years ago this month. So it's sort of fun to think about that. Dear, fellow Fool. When I recently tapped into the pages of Wikipedia and looked up "nanotechnology," I was startled by the image on the top of the page, so startled, in fact, that I decided Rule Breaker s readers had to see it for themselves, so take a look.
That giant creature is a dust mite, an organism normally invisible to our naked eyes, but massive thanks to a high-powered microscope. And just in front of him, in that picture, six nanogears. I'm guessing he's the first little dust mite in the history of creation to encounter this entirely new manmade object at his scale, the nanoscale. Marking the end of the first year of our service in this review issue, and the beginning of the next year, I want to say three things about that image.
First and most obvious, that picture will remind you that we are your nano-hub. Nanotechnology is still very early on in its technology cycle and few important public companies are focused on nanotech, for that reason we aren't yet ready to pull the trigger on many recommendations in nano, but you bet, that as this technology scales and enters ubiquity in American industry and business, we will be here helping you think through nanotechnology, pointing out the winning stocks in that area, in plain English.
The second thing I'd like to say about that photo, is that over the past year we've all, me included, been a bit like that bug coming across something new and manmade and I hope quite wonderful, for the first time. Rule Breaker s has had a truly great year debuting as a world-class advisory, helping you beat the market with the best growth stocks. I hope you've enjoyed discovering us and interacting with us, I know I speak for the entire Rule Breaker s team when I say that we have had a great time with you.
Third, that photograph reminds me to remind you to get psyched. As amazing as that picture is, it's just one picture, can you even begin to imagine this world we're moving into? Are you ready to quest with us to find tomorrow's new leaders a day early, hunting for the Rule Breaker s? Thanks for your commitment in this first year, particularly thanks to those who created value for all of us via our discussion boards, indeed, we're going to welcome a few of them on to our team, we'll talk about that next issue, every post is appreciated.
In the meantime, this issue reviews all existing Rule Breaker s picks, have at it and Fool on! Well, now back in the modern day. My first reflection on this Nanotechnology has been five years away for 35 years. In fact, we did debut a feature, a regular monthly feature in Rule Breaker s in the year , it was called Nanotech Universe, and each month, our two correspondents, Carl Wherrett and John Yelovich, just outside contractors contributing their viewpoint to Motley Fool Rule Breaker s, would talk some about where nanotechnology was and what was happening.
And sure enough, there were some interesting companies doing business there. We never ended up picking many or any of them really for Motley Fool Rule Breaker s, and here we are in , and I'm still wondering where is nanotech today? It is amazing. I did go into Wikipedia to check the nanotechnology entry. There is no sign of that picture that I was referencing 15 years ago, but then again, after 15 years, Wikipedia entries probably do change. But I do remember the picture -- it was an amazing picture of a dust mite encountering nanogears, man-made objects, at the nano level.
So reflection No. It is enticing, though, everything from better fabrics to -- you know, I'm thinking about the 5-Stock Sampler I picked most recently. Indistinguishable from magic, as Arthur C. Clarke said, and that's the way nanotech continues to feel to me. The problem is, it really is not much more than just magic, something fantastic that doesn't actually exist because it really still -- even though people I know that are hearing me right now, some of you working in labs working with nanotech.
So you're here saying, Dave, listen, it is real, I'm working on it, but it clearly hasn't deployed itself yet in a ubiquitous, meaningful way within our culture. So thought No. Yeah, within a few years, I think we discontinued our nanotech universe articles.
Carl and John were doing a great job with them, but it just didn't seem like there was that much to talk about. Reflection No. We've lost track of Carl Wherrett over the years, but I'm happy to say, John Yelovich remains a wonderful contributor to the Motley Fool community in lots of different ways.
I see he just posted on the Roku board today, 15 years later. But Carl and John occasionally were asked to provide a stock thought or recommendation or two, and I'm really happy I listened to them in , because they started talking about a company called Universal Display OLED 3. Yep, as in that OLED. So back in , LCD televisions, do you member those? Liquid Crystal Diode televisions were all the rage. They were the high-definition televisions of choice. They were also much more affordable back then, but Universal Display, little Universal Display, became a stock recommendation in , and its partner Samsung has gone on to make OLED big time.
And that may have seemed upside-down and a crazy stock to recommend. So thank you again to John Yelovich and Carl Wherrett. They have the byline on that pick in Motley Fool Rule Breaker s. Universal Display, that's thought No. I briefly used a phrase I no longer use. I said "growth stocks. That's not how I think about the world. I don't think there are growth stocks and value stocks.
I also don't say I'm a growth investor or she's a value investor. I don't think those are good descriptors -- they're bland labels. There's some baggage tied up around them, they don't mean a lot to me. And when people say, studies show that one type of stock outperforms another, I'm always suspicious, wondering exactly how we are categorizing what is a growth stock or a value stock.
But I must admit, in this essay, I used the phrase growth stocks. So presumably, I was still rocking it in the first 10 years of The Motley Fool back then, but I have certainly thrown off that mortal coil since. And my final reflection about that essay is, probably just at the end of it, I was celebrating and saying, get psyched about the world we're moving into.
And I think that has been the right mentality. Back in , 15 years ago this month, we didn't know about cloud computing, we didn't know that Hepatitis C would be cured, we didn't know that electric vehicles would ever be a thing, let alone be "the thing," it seems these days, and many other changes besides. Yes, there have been some tough years, including this one, since , but that basic optimism, I think, is the right approach to take in every year.
Yep, even through the bad ones. And so, continuing to ask here, in October , what's a stock, what's an exciting new technology or company that you and I want to get invested in, become part owners of, that is our orientation, always will be for Rule Breaker investors. We're going to jump forward almost four years; it's going to be the March issue of Motley Fool Rule Breaker s.
A year-and-a-half ago, we started an experiment. We knew our Rule Breaker s community was smart. You include many working professionals in the high-tech arena, many retired professionals who know business and investing, and we'd be fools not to listen to you more often.
And that was the idea behind our first "take that" contest. We suspected there was at least one company on our scorecard that you thought we should sell, so we asked you to submit your arguments for why it would underperform the market, we asked you to help us figure out which company was most deserving of, in modern parlance, being voted off the island.
Take that, our contest really, really worked. At the time some of our members didn't like the contest, I disagreed and I continue to disagree, you either believe in community intelligence or you don't, you either believe that our membership, our Rule Breaker s community, is an incredible asset, full of knowledge and insights that can improve your investing, or by contrast, you think it's just another heard doomed to make bad decisions.
Now, you've told us to take that again. It was harder to find enthusiastic nominations in this latest go around, you may have felt that many of our stocks are too cheap to part ways with, and with this I agree. How could I not, with so many stocks down so far, despite impressive profits among what I consider future industry leaders? I have no interest in selling my Blue Nile, by Bankrate, my Baidu , each is a Rule Breaker and each is part of my personal portfolio, but in particular, an entry by AirForceFool, that's the screen name of one of our members, about TASER, ticker symbol back then TASR, caught my attention, and caught many of yours as well.
His argument to sell wasn't based on TASER's innovative products or technology, nor does he disagree with most of the rule breaking aspects of the company, but he argues, most cogently, that TASER's management has so little focus on shareholders that it's failed to create value for years, and that the condition will persist. Our community voted this the top entry to Take That.
I think it's the right call and that the power of community will prove right once again. Well, my first reflection is I feel just the same way about the Motley Fool community in as I did back in And in fact, this issue came out at almost the market bottom.
And there I was, disconsolately deciding, yes, we'll just go ahead and sell TASER, because that XM Satellite Radio contest winner or loser, if you will, from a few years back, had really nosedived, and I do believe in our community's intelligence. A bit about the Take That contest. It's something we don't do anymore at Rule Breaker s, and I'm actually scratching my head as to why. I love the idea of it. We definitely did it for years after that, at some point, maybe it was a changeover in who was helping oversee the service and I took my eye off the ball.
I'm not sure why, but I still love the idea. And maybe we'll reinvigorate it here in the year ahead of the Take That contest -- namely, one where you, as a Rule Breaker member, and I know many of you listening to me right now can look up and down our scorecard and say, hey, Dave and team, I really think this one [laughs] is a bad stock pick and is not going to beat the market from here.
And then having our community vote and acting on that. Well, that's how Take That worked. In the mids the stock was in single digits, kind of a penny stock, and people were still trying to figure out whether satellite radio is for real. Starting from that single-digit stock, which is often enticing to newer investors who love to see lower-priced stocks, it became a darling.
So it had one amazing move from to the year , and since then, it's kind of been dead money. If we do reinvigorate the Take That contest again, it might be high up on people's list. Why do we have it in Motley Fool Rule Breaker s? Well, we had Pandora. Pandora was a selection. And speaking of Sirius, I need to take a serious look again at that company. It hurt a little bit, it was a double-wreck of mine at the time, but it was also quite a loser. One of the two brothers who had been running the company years before had moved on.
Do you remember how many negative articles that were written, headlines about how tasers kill and how they're not safe. And while that is tragically true in some rare circumstances, it's now evident that they are much better [laughs] in many cases than firing real bullets. And many of the problems we still have today -- boy! I wish people were being tased instead of shot. I think that leads to a better world. Well, it seemed that way for several years, but now looking backwards from the future, that would have been a great time to buy the stock.
So maybe Take That doesn't work every time, and certainly, community intelligence won't work every time. And my picking, as is clearly evident with Pandora, is not right every time. But here again we see that the benefits of finding a winner, whether we're talking about Universal Display from the previous essay or in this case, Axon Enterprise, the winner so far wipes out the losses you have in your losers that it really is reminding us that stock-picking is about finding the winners.
You know, buy-and-hold investing doesn't work on its own. And compounded returns don't just happen at any good number -- you actually have to find the great companies to make buy-to-hold investing and compounding returns work. And I'm happy to say that through the Rule Breaker traits that I'm constantly talking about on this podcast, whether we're talking about the companies themselves or the traits you need to exhibit as an investor, these work.
And one thing we're reminded as we go over Essays from Yesterday is, they work over time. I hope you're having as much fun as I am, or at least half as much fun as I am going back through time and then forward through time, thinking about the conditions of the investing world and what we were saying back then, and then reflecting on it today and the lessons that we're learning. Well, my fourth and final essay is probably my favorite essay from these four -- Rick, we're going to move through time again.
But not that far -- we're going to alight in June I honestly can't name a single one of their songs, but I'm still a big fan of the Grateful Dead. No, it's not because the Grateful Dead songbook album cover features a jester. I'm a deadhead because of the band's business brilliance. Jerry Garcia and his bandmates understood open source, the free sharing of information decades before the concept gained popularity. Don't let the bands s psychedelic vibe obscure the incredibly savvy business thinking behind this concept, by welcoming the sharing of their music.
Garcia and his bandmates unleash the power of open source, enabling fans to share the band's music with one another and with new listeners. For the past six months, I have repeated a quote from Garcia so much that it's become one of my mantras as an investor: "You do not merely want to be considered just the best of the best; you want to be considered the only ones who do what you do. Because it reminds us to be what only we can be. In our quest for great purpose and profit, we need to find what makes us unique, our vision, our passions and even our idiosyncrasies.
Connect this concept with a commandment from internet marketing wiz Seth Godin, who tells businesses to take their edge to the edge. That's exactly what the members of the Grateful Dead did by open sourcing. It was their edge, their unique vision, and they took that willingness to share freely to the edge.
The result was blowout success, the stuff of history books. There's an investment lesson here, find and invest in companies that are the only ones doing what they do. Many of our Rule Breaker s fit this bill. Have you looked at OpenTable recently? At its scale, the company really is the only one doing what it does.
My mantra is not an acid test for instant investment success, but it is an excellent guidepost for investors, especially Rule Breaker s. The Grateful Dead performed approximately 2, shows, and because of the band's stance on open sourcing, nearly 2, were taped. These recordings will provide the Dead with a legacy that will last long after the other members joined Jerry in that big tour bus in the sky. This staying power, the kind that only comes from being an innovator, is something we should look for in the companies we invest in.
Well, in retrospect I think that was a special essay, at least it was special to me, because I now see that the very first Great Quotes, Vol. But the very first one -- the Jerry Garcia quote was right in there. So I was obviously licking my chops as we opened up this podcast.
It was December of when we did our first Great Quotes , and one of the first five that came to my mind was that great quote from Jerry Garcia. The date, by the way, if anybody would enjoy hearing those first five great quotes again, was the December 16th, edition of Rule Breaker Investing. Also, Seth Godin is mentioned in this essay, and Seth Godin was a guest on this podcast on August 1st, So, a couple of years ago, he opened up my Authors in August in In fact, I think that was my first Authors in August.
And there they were both making the appearance in this essay to kick off Rule Breaker s in I have to mention that in the very first line of that essay, you may have heard me say, and the pedants among us, and those who are fans of my own pedantry can't help but notice that I lead off with, I honestly can't name a single one of their songs, but I'm still a big fan of The Grateful Dead. Not yet - we're keeping it in the browser at least for now. No app download required to access anything on the site.
To change your display name, log in to Podknife and select "Account Settings" in the dropdown menu. From the Account Settings page, enter your desired new display name and press the "Save" button to confirm the change. To change your password, log in to Podknife and select "Account Settings" in the dropdown menu.
From the Account Settings page, enter your desired new password in the two fields below "Update Password" and press the "Save" button to confirm the change. You can also check all your favorite podcasts.